Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the Automobile Essay

Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the AutomobileMitigation, to the subvert of some, has become publicly synonymous with notions of economy and conservation. Mitigation is neither the preservation nor is it the conservation of habitat. Mitigation is the creation of new habitat, or the guarding of an existing habitat to make up for the destruction of similar habitat somewhere else. It was the disreputable environmental buzz word of the nineties, notorious for its criticism and praise by developers. Criticism because mitigation delays and obstructs their progress, and praise by those who take advantage of loopholes at bottom the guidelines. All the while ecologists are accepting the mitigations like ill gustatory perception medicine in the hope that it will work, after all it is at least something. It has gone so far that some, working within the handle of restoration ecology and other areas have misgivings about sharing the experience acquired through their efforts i n regards to their efficacy in restoring or moving habitat set to be destroyed. They feel that their successes in mitigation will hardly encourage the destruction of more crucial habitat. It is a bittersweet triumph , for them mitigation is definitely not conservation. With this clarification of mitigation in musical theme the development of institutionalizeation technologies is faced with a dilemma. A way to transport people, goods and services along the surface of the earth in a direction unobtrusive to the flora ,fauna and natural environment which surround us. If going through, or around the habitat is unacceptable, what about going above or beneath it ? Tunnels and bridges have been employed as methods of conveyance through areas where make roads was not feasible for many... ...ficult at best to recreate public presentation ecosystems that are so complex. When faced with these situations it is important that designers consider all options for the proposed roadway. In th at particular case it seems a bridge would function equally as well as a roadway, would require far less mitigation, and would pull through the vital integrity of the habitat at the same time. References http//www.taxpayer.net/ (Taxpayers for Common Sense) http//build. tunnel.org/tunnel/oldSite/index.html (Yes on Measure T, San Mateo tunnel) http//www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bridge/resources.html (NovaBridges) http//www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ (PBSNova) http//www.traylor.com/tunnels/ (Traylor) http//www.tcagencies.com/index.html (Transportation Corridor Agency) http//www.epa.gov/OWOW/ (EPA office of water) http//www.uswetlands.com/ (US wetland services)